When the map needs an update
Every time we move through a familiar environment, the hippocampus consults an internal map, a detailed spatial representation that is built up through repeated experience. But what happens when something unexpected occurs on a well-known route? Researchers at the University Hospital Bonn (UKB) and the University of Bonn were able to demonstrate in a mouse model that the brain does not redraw its maps from scratch. Instead, it annotates them: preserving the underlying spatial layout while overlaying new information on top of the existing map. Their findings have now been published in the journal PNAS.
The diversity of neural activity can adapt to accommodate new information. New information can deform the neural activity manifold.© University Hospital Bonn (UKB) / Julia Kuhl
Bernstein member involved: Tatjana Tchumatchenko
The hippocampus, the brain’s working memory, is shaped like a seahorse and is located in the temporal lobe of both the left and right hemispheres. Hippocampal CA3 circuits, which link information and support the recognition of memories, keep their spatial maps stable while layering new annotations on top, much like a navigation app that preserves your route while flagging an incident ahead. A Bonn-based research team has now arrived at these findings. To do so, they recorded the activity of CA3 axons in mice traversing a familiar linear running route. At a fixed point along the route, the scientists introduced a mildly aversive but harmless air puff stimulus, comparable to an unexpected obstacle on a road, and tracked how the hippocampal network updated its representation before, during, and after the event.
“What surprised us most was that the spatial map itself never changed. The basic spatial map remained completely intact, while the network simultaneously incorporated a new annotation. It’s as if the hippocampus has a versioning system that writes new experiences as a separate layer over a map,” says co-senior author Prof. Heinz Beck from the Institute for Experimental Epileptology and Cognitive Sciences at the UKB. He is a member of the ImmunoSensation3 Cluster of Excellence and the Transdisciplinary Research Area (TRA) “Life & Health” at the University of Bonn.
Nevertheless, the system did not react blindly to the new event. “We found that the gust of air generated systematic geometric deformations in the shared manifold of population dynamics that reliably marked the location and time of the event. However, these deformations did not overwrite the underlying spatial map but rather superimposed themselves on it,” says first author Albert Miguel-López. “The result functioned simultaneously as a positional map and as an event log, so that both levels could be read independently of one another.”
Updating the maps is a collaborative effort of the neural network
The study compared two different types of CA3 axons, each connecting the dorsal hippocampus, which is responsible for memory recollection and orientation, of one hemisphere to the dorsal hippocampus of the other hemisphere. Both circuits updated their maps in a similar manner and distributed the update signal evenly across place cells, which are responsible for orientation in the environment, and non-place cells. These results suggest that the hippocampus does not leave map revisions to a small team of specialized neurons, but rather distributes the update across the entire network of nerve cells, thereby ensuring that the new annotation is stably integrated into the existing map. “Our findings make it clear that hippocampal maps do not represent a static image of the environment, but rather evolve in subtle, continuous steps, constantly embedding new information while the basic geometric structure of the space remains intact,” says co-senior author Prof. Tatjana Tchumatchenko from the Institute for Experimental Epileptology and Cognitive Research at the UKB. She is a spokesperson for the TRA “Life & Health” and a member of the TRA “Modeling” at the University of Bonn. “The mathematical separability of the spatial map and the annotation layer shows that while the brain stores these two types of information together, it organizes them in such a way that they do not overwrite each other. This expands our understanding of how the brain structures information and how it ensures both stability and flexibility at the same time.”
